PS-ROs, Innovation and Creativity
In “Beyond Crisis”1 , we have suggested
that a key aspect of management over the next decade
is the ability to challenge assumptions, detect change
and create new ideas. In doing this we found the Fox/Hedgehog
model useful:
The Fox knows many things, but the Hedgehog knows
one big thing.
Archilochus
(7th-century BCE).
Hedgehogs relate things to a concrete narrative,
through which everything in life is reduced to a single
set of certainties. Foxes, on the other hand, distrust
grand designs and absolute truths, and instead pursue
many ends, often unrelated and even contradictory. They
use a flexible array of insights that guide them as
they experiment, play with ideas and experience, explore
and, on occasion, pounce.
Recent psychological testing2 has shown
that this is a valid and powerful way of classifying
people (More information can be found in Tetlock3
). In a sense, the hedgehog has one big trick and the
fox has many. The hedgehog likes to keep the status
quo, straight and steady, while the fox likes change.
The hedgehog is good at detail, the fox gets bored easily.
However, no person is 100% fox or hedgehog, rather everyone
has a leaning one way or the other. This means that
they can learn new behaviours.
In our experience, perhaps due to commoditisation
and becoming leaner, organisations have got rid of most
of their foxes. Foxes are difficult for managers; they
raise objections and ask questions; they put forward
suggestions unrelated to and outside their job description;
they argue about priorities and directions; they make
life difficult. But foxy behaviour is the root of innovation
and organisations in today’s world need to innovate
or they will die.
This innovative, curious behaviour is needed if you
want to quickly adapt your organisation to take advantage
of new opportunities. You’ve got to be looking
in order to find them, for a start. You have to be aware
of what is going on in the environment and system around
you. You also need to be aware of what is happening
inside your organisation; what trends there are and
what resources you have. From that awareness and insight,
you can develop new options and adapt your organisation
accordingly.
From the external trends, you will see that organisations
need to move towards social enterprise-like thinking.
In other words, they need to benefit all of
their stakeholders, not just their shareholders. This
means the people who work for and with them; it means
the larger community and ultimately, it means the planet.
It encourages innovation and foxy behaviour and becomes
a cycle of virtue – each part contributing to the others.
Keeping your people happy and enabling (and encouraging)
innovation (and foxy behaviour), makes them feel even
better because they can see their contribution which
makes sense (and cents) for the organisation, increasing
profitability while taking care of all the stakeholders
and their shared future. Each part reinforces a positive
movement.
So what now? In many organisations we find that when
we need to kick start innovation and idea generation,
then put it into practice, we no longer have internal
capacity and must go to external consultants for help.
What would happen if we identified the innovative, creative
behaviours we need and found out where they already
existed in the organisation? What if we then encouraged
that sort of behaviour (i.e. foxy behaviour) from those
people, even if they are hedgehogs? Innovation and creativity
require a different type of thinking; hedgehogs will
need support and encouragement as they develop these
different thinking “muscles”. We need to give them a
blame-free, encouraging and supportive environment,
and the permission to make mistakes. Perhaps outside
help WILL be needed to get creativity and innovation
flowing. But once started, it will remain a powerful
force within an organisation, for as long as it is encouraged
and acknowledged.
© Patricia Lustig, 2010
1 Ringland, Gill, Oliver Sparrow and
Patricia Lustig, Beyond Crisis John Wiley 2010
2 Rosnow, R. L. ‘Hedgehogs, Foxes,
and the evolving social contract in psychological
science: Ethical challenges and methodological opportunities’.
Psychological Methods, 2 (4), 345-356, 1997.
3 Tetlock, Philip, Expert Political
Judgement, Princeton University Press, 2005